Posts Tagged ‘Review’

How To Be A Serial Killer – DVD Talk Review

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

by Bill Gibron (DVD Talk)

how_to_be_a_serial_killerThe Product:
It’s been discussed before, but it bears repeating – can one fantastic facet of a film make up for the remainder of mediocrity? Put another way, does one horrific element undermine an otherwise sensational bit of cinema? You see, it really is a dilemma. Now, music critics would argue that awful lyrics or a lame solo destroys an otherwise strong song. A bad track amongst an otherwise solid album, however, can be excused. Classic books aren’t unmade by ineffectual passages or clichéd characterization. So skewed logic suggests if an otherwise solid work can survive a rather substantial flub, a piss poor one can be perked up with a near Oscar worthy performance – and that’s exactly the case with writer/director Luke Ricci’s How to Be a Serial Killer. Inside all the marginal mock doc set-ups, the overly ironic “murder as a means of self-actualization” and significant lack of gore lies an acting job so good, and a performer so special, that to miss what he does with this otherwise underwritten mess would be criminal.
The Plot:
Mike Wilson has a proposition for you. If you follow his patented personal guidelines, if you practice and perform his certified slaughter system, if you forget that what you’re about to do is against the law and simply give in to your caveman killing instincts, you too can become psychologically sound Ted Bundy. That’s right, Mike is a serial killer and he has a 10 step program guaranteed to guide you toward a better life in service of your own inner Gacy. In that regard, he hooks up with loser video store clerk Bart, and attempts to show him the sublime slice and dive side of life. Of course, there’s a nosy girlfriend who wonders what her clean cut and dapper dude is doing with a scraggly haired weirdo until all hours of the night. One look in Mike’s secret safe seals her buttinsky fate. It’s just all part of the life lessons extolled by a man who’s an expert on How to Be a Serial Killer.

The DVD:
If a movie ever needed a messiah, Dameon Clarke is it. Invested with keeping the otherwise limp How to Be a Serial Killer on its toes, this journeyman Tinseltown talent (his IMDb page is quite impressive) delivers in ways this otherwise sorry film couldn’t possible imagine. As if by sheer force of his own skill will, Clarke takes tired lines of dialogue and enlivens them, takes stultifying dull premises and electrifies them, and supports his occasionally shuffling co-stars in a manner that makes them appear competent. Does it save the movie? Heck no. Does Clarke deserve a lard-ass’s bucket of brownies for trying? Yeppers! In fact, if it wasn’t for writer/director Ricci’s desire to employ irony as his only method of instilling humor, or his lack of gory goodness, we might have something here. The premise is initially inventive in its infomercial-like designs, and Clarke continuously commands our attention. But a good looking girl in a room full of fat chicks does not a swanky model’s party make. This actor could be delivering the most drop dead brilliant performance this side of Christoph Waltz in Inglourious Basterds and it wouldn’t elevate How to Be a Serial Killer’s inherent watchability.

Why? Well, for one thing, Ricci has no story to tell. He mixes things up too much, using the hard sell sequences (and Clarke’s strangled steps toward achieving your mass murder goals) as a set-up, but many time, the illustrative vignette doesn’t match the main theme. Instead, it’s usually more time for Clarke to show up co-star Matthew Gray Gubler. Not to diss the solid cinematic citizen, but his bumbling Bart can’t hold a piece of paraffin to madman Mike. It’s like watching two different dynamics, one on autopilot, the other crashing and burning in spectacular fashion. In fact, a lot of How to Be a Serial Killer plays like a sluggish indie nightmare intercepted by a fantastic, fascinating interloper. While everyone else is desperately trying to stay awake, Clarke is cleaning their clocks with ease. So aside from the story, what else is missing here? Well, any interesting arterial spray, for one. How about a law enforcement foil for our hack and sack hero? Without an outside presence pressuring Mike, his actions function in a fictional vacuum. As a result, there’s no suspense or sense of dread.

But the biggest problem here is what many would call the smarm factor. Horror comedies usually don’t cotton to outright mockery. They like to have their satire laughing with, not at, the genre. But How to Be a Serial Killer occasionally seems to be an outright affront at the whole Henry: Portrait of a… proposition. Spoofs are fine and a lampoon can legitimately undermine a specific movie type. But Ricci doesn’t seem sure of what he wants to accomplish. His focus falters often and unnecessarily. Had Clarke been given the chance to take the character to extremes the script wants to avoid, had there been a more menacing approach to the comedy, we’d tag along for the blood-soaked swap meet. But How to Be a Serial Killer is so cloudy, so completely devoid of a reason to root for it, that the resulting 90 minutes crawl by like a prolonged visit to the proctologist. There are possibilities here, hints that writer/director Ricci has a lot of talent and stored cinematic acumen. But if you are looking for something that takes the piss out of your run of the mill murderous psycho, this is not it. Dameon Clarke does a wonderful job here. The rest of this movie is rubbish.

The Video:
While a review of the DVD proper is in the works, this version of the film was presented on the critic’s favorite format – the preview SCREENER. As a result, no tech spec scores will be awarded since final product was not offered.

The Audio:
The same thing applies here. While a review of the DVD proper is in the works, this version of the film was presented on the critic’s favorite format – the preview SCREENER. As a result, no tech spec scores will be awarded since final product was not offered.

The Extras:
See above.

Final Thoughts: This critic has been sitting on this review for quite some time, hoping that his hatred of this one note (and one singular performance) motion picture pariah would ebb and fade away. Sadly, no such luck. Instead, in re-watching parts a second time, a once lenient judgment turned almost violent. Moderating the final evaluation to take into consideration several factors – Screener version of the DVD, Clarke’s work, Ricci’s noble attempts – a Skip It was reversed. Now, officially, How to Be a Serial Killer earns an unenthusiastic Rent It. Some in the dread demo may like it. A few will even mock yours truly for not “getting” this movie’s modus. Whatever the case, be forewarned – there’s twice as much bad as good here, and it’s crystal clear that one amazing man can’t salvage a swiftly sinking ship. How to Be a Serial Killer should have better. Instead, it’s a major missed opportunity.

0

DVD Review – Criminal Minds The Complete Forth Season

Monday, September 14th, 2009

by Blake Matthews – Blog Critics Video

Criminal Minds is series that premiered on CBS in 2005 and followed profilers from the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) led by Jason Gideon (Mandy Patinkin). The team profiles various killers known as unsubs — unidentified subjects.

Due to creative differences between Patinkin and the creators, he left after the second episode of the third season. The departure of the lead could have been the death of the show; however Gideon’s second in command, Agent Aaron “Hotch” Hotchner, (Thomas Gibson) was put in charge of the profilers which include Emily Prentiss (Paget Brewster), Dr. Spencer Reid (Matthew Gray Gubler), Derek Morgan (Shemar Moore), and Jennifer ‘JJ’ Jareau (A.J. Cook), who is the agent who decides what case they take on each week. Rounding out the team in a tech support role is Penelope Garcia (Kirsten Vangsness) who is a computer whiz and helps get the team the information they need almost instantaneously.

After the profilers dealt with Gideon’s departure (he had a mental breakdown on the show and was seen driving off into the sunset) they added a new member to the team — David Rossi (Joe Mantegna), who is a more experienced agent and is a counterpoint to Hotch since Hotch can become emotionally detached from a case and Rossi adds some humanity.

The show is different from other crime shows as it concentrates on the killers instead of the crime and has the killer be either gender, whereas most serial killers portrayed in shows are male. The show has also had some great guest stars and season four is no different as Wil Wheaton, Jason Alexander, Luke Perry, Mitch Pileggi, Alex O’Loughlin Garret Dillahunt, Bruce Davison, Walton Goggins, C. Thomas Howell, Jackson Rathbone, and Jane Lynch have appeared as either the killer of the week or someone connected to the profilers.

Criminal Minds is dark, with the team delving into the psychological profiles of the killers and deducing what the unsub is trying to accomplish. This causes the team to get into some interesting cat-and-mouse games to bring the killer to justice and the writers have put many of the team in danger at one time or another. This season had a two-part finale that crossed from Detroit into Canada, and had a previous unsub return, putting Hotch’s life in danger as the screen faded to black.

The extras for Criminal Minds: The Fourth Season include “Working the Scene,” short (between three and six minutes) behind the scenes featurettes which concentrate on one aspect of the episode in question. These featurettes cover guest stars, stunts, directing, and more. There are eleven of these featurettes spread out over the seven discs, and they’re quite interesting.

“Character Profiles” gives each of the seven starring characters a three to four minute profile in which the writers, producers, and the actor who portrays the character discuss what drives the character.

There’s also a gag reel and several deleted scenes rounding out the extras. It would have been nice to have some commentaries, but with a new season about to start, maybe that DVD release will include some.

0

Film Review: (500) Days of Summer

Monday, September 14th, 2009

by Katie Archer - This Is Surrey Today

Last year a study by Heriot Watt University suggested love lives up and down the country were being ruined by rom coms.These sickly sweet, fluffy films were accused of being passion assassins in disguise by giving us all unrealistic expectations of relationships.So don’t be put off by this film because it’s classified as a rom com – it certainly isn’t leading anyone up the garden path of thinking every love story ends happily ever after.For all of us who can’t stomach yet another nauseatingly formulaic tale of boy meets girl, this is the anti rom com.Tom Hansen (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is a true romantic. He believes in finding The One. He is exactly the sort of person who regularly has his hopes raised, then dashed, by rom coms.Summer Finn (Zooey Deschanel) is his polar opposite. She doesn’t believe love exists and doesn’t see the point in wasting her youth on getting a boyfriend.

These two opposing views collide when Summer starts work as a secretary at the greetings card firm where Tom is slowly wasting away what could have been a brilliant career as an architect.Tom immediately becomes convinced that Summer is the girl he’s been searching for, despite discouragement from workmate McKenzie (Geoffrey Arend) who claims she’s too aloof to like.Discovering a shared love of The Smiths in the lift one morning, Tom’s certainties about Summer being the love of his life are cemented and he drives friends McKenzie and Paul (Matthew Gray Gubler) mad with his obsessing over everything she says and does.One drunken work night out at a karaoke bar, a sloshed McKenzie gives his friend a helping hand by telling Summer Tom likes her – and from there the relationship tentatively takes off.

Except… is it a relationship? Summer refuses to put a label on it and Tom tries to convince himself this is all fine with him as he goes through ever more anguished stages of emotional trauma.(500) Days of Summer dots about backwards and forwards through the 500 days of Tom’s obsession with the woman he believes is the one for him.This isn’t as annoying a tactic as you might expect – in fact it works rather well as a lot of the scenes are played over and over again as Tom gains more insight into what went on between himself and Summer.It’s obvious from the off how all this is going to end between the mismatched pair, but the film is no less enjoyable for it.

Some of the film’s style borrows so heavily from Amelie that it seems a bit cheeky, but this offbeat romance has so much charm and likeability that you can forgive it a bit of copycatting.Chloe Moretz has a lovely role as Tom’s little sister Rachel, with some great lines as she tries to counsel her lovestruck brother through his heartache.There aren’t any really stand-out performances, but it’s a solid cast and a refreshing change from the usual samey rom com line ups.Even if you’ve got a heart of stone and can’t stand the merest hint of romance in a film, go and see this. You’ll be pleasantly surprised.

0
Tags: , ,
Posted in Movies |

Criminal Minds: The Complete Fourth Season – DVD Review

Monday, September 14th, 2009

By Patrick Luce – Monsters & Critcs

crim4dvdThe fourth season of Criminal Minds sees the show starting to be a bit formulaic, but still able to throw a surprise or two – especially in the final episodes of the season.
Criminal Minds follows the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit as they crisscross the country helping various law enforcement agencies stop the country’s most twisted criminals (sometimes you wonder how they got some of these episodes on the air).

The team is made up of a variety of specialists – including street smart cop Derek Morgan (Shemar Moore); computer tech wizard Penelope Garcia (Kirsten Vangsness); FBI agent Emily Prentiss (Paget Brewster); genius Dr. Spencer Reid (Matthew Gray Gubler); public liaison officer Jennifer ‘JJ’ Jareau (A.J. Cook); by the book FBI team leader Aaron ‘Hotch’ Hotchner (Thomas Gibson); and profiler extraordinaire David Rossi (Joe Mantegna).
The show’s success rest in the ensemble cast and the excellent way the actors seem to play off each other. The series never feels like a vanity show with one actor as the main star and the rest just there for window dressing.

The writers do excellent work keeping each character involved in every episode and the series grounded in the world of the profilers – where very little time is spent on the characters’ lives outside the office.
With that said, I still feel Criminal Minds continues to suffer from the departure of Mandy Patinkin and his Jason Gideon character.

Watching the fourth season, I also felt several times that the show was in need of a cast shake-up and some fresh faces. There is a bit of a chance for this when JJ goes on her maternity leave and a new liaison is added to the team.
The show also seems to be on a bit of auto-pilot and just covering the same ground that has been used in past seasons or on other similarly themed crime shows. Most episodes find the team on the trail of their suspect and managing save the day at the last minute. While not every episode follows this pattern (“Omnivore” has to be the best episode of the season and sets up a great cliffhanger), it happens enough during the fourth season to make the show a bit of a drag.

In the past, the series’ formulaic feel was able to rely on its cast to keep it interesting, but this season even the cast seems a bit out of steam. They all provide solid performances, but do little to add to their characters. We get a few glimpses of new ground being laid for the characters (mostly with Gubler’s Reid), but it isn’t enough to keep certain characters from being a bit boring.
I realize these characters are extremely serious and handle some of the worst crimes that no one should ever have to see, but the fourth season becomes a bit of a drag halfway through the episodes because it seems to be just grinding the same material again and again.

Gibson’s Hotch is dry and lacks any real emotion for most of the season – despite the choices past seasons forced his character to make to stay with the team. Brewster’s Prentiss seems to become easily forgettable mid-season. Moore’s Derek Morgan continues to serve little more purpose than giving the show its good looking tough guy with the heart of gold.
I also grew quickly bored with Mantegna’s David Rossi. Mantegna is a great actor, and does his best with the show, but I never could get past the feeling he was just another version of Patinkin’s Gideon – which in turn just reminded me of how good the show used to be.
Luckily, the fourth season saw Vangsness’ Penelope Garcia getting more screen time, and even getting out of her computer lair for a couple of “in the field” assignments. It seems all of these crime shows now need an “odd” tech to provide some comic relief or give the show character. Vangsness’ Penelope Garcia is the queen of these kinds of characters and she gives Criminal Minds its heart and its fresh feel.
I hope she continues to become a bigger part of the series and even maybe starts packing a gun. I can see Morgan running for the hills now. With the great cliffhanger, I hope the writers manage to shake-up the show some and get the characters out of their comfort zone.
With the fourth season, the writers seemed to have taken all of the characters to some pretty dark places, caused them to question their commitments to the team, and taken an emotional toil on each one. Now, I hope we will get to see the aftermath of all that work.
The fourth season comes with some expected special features that take you behind the scenes, give you a look at some deleted scenes, and some profiles. There is also a gag reel – which is always funny on a show as serious as Criminal Minds.
Criminal Minds: The Complete Fourth Season doesn’t break any new ground, but it also doesn’t do anything to make fans give up on the show. The series stays with what has worked in the past, and manages to end with a decent cliffhanger that will make fans want to tune in to the fifth season premiere to see what happens next.

0

Criminal Minds: You Can’t Help But Watch

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

The last time I took a stab at watching Criminal Minds, the story revolved around an adorable young boy who enticed women shopping at the mall into helping him find his daddy.

What the women discovered was a deadly trap — Daddy was a serial killer who found them first, then kidnapped and tortured them until they died horrific deaths.

The creepy closing scene had a captured pop proudly telling the cops that he didn’t even ask for the last victim; his elementary school-aged boy had brought her to him all on his own.

That’s when I decided the nightmares weren’t worth sticking with this show.

But after seeing the series steadily holding in the Top 10 primetime Nielsen ratings week after week, there seemed to be something I was missing. So, putting the creep factor on hold, I plunged in and discovered that this show has become an addictive delight.

The series focuses more on the character of the criminal than the crime itself, although most of the heinous acts play out in excruciating detail. These crimes aren’t for the fainthearted, though there’s more humor and humanity in the series than what first meets the eye. Seldom, however, have there been lead characters with such dark back stories attached.

Booth from Bones might have had a troubled childhood with a hard-core dad and a brother he now keeps covering for, but he had a downright 1950s Leave it to Beaver family life compared to Criminal Minds’ resident hottie Derek Morgan, played by pin-up guy Shemar Moore. Morgan is smooth as good whiskey around the ladies, and he leads his team with an unwaivering self-assurance. But when he was 10, his father died and he was put under the protective wing of the leader of a local youth center. The leader helped him out of his poverty by getting him a football scholarship, but the closet predator also sexually abused Morgan for most of his young life.

Sweet geeks have remained a crime drama staple, puttering around their labs and looking up to the real detectives. But behind sweet geek Dr. Spencer Reid (Matthew Gray Gubler) is another very troubled childhood. Dad deserted him and he was left in the care of mom, a paranoid schizophrenic who he later had to institutionalize. Talk about some guilt. And the young genius took more than his fair share of bullying over the years, including once being tied up naked to the school’s football goalpost for all the students to see. Thank goodness for early graduation.

In one particularly touching episode — well, it did also include the plot about a guy who picked up women and then tortured them to death in a ritual involving cleaning fluids — Morgan helped Reid connect with a comely bartender. Reid even raced to her rescue at the end before cleaning became the death of her.

Then there’s the perpetually morose unit chief Aaron “Hotch” Hotchner. At first I thought it was just the years that actor Thomas Gibsom had to spend in the odd sitcom Dharma & Greg that made him go for the dark side. But no — turns out his character suffers from not being able to put his family first. Can you blame him after what he had to put up with when he was married to dippy hippie Dharma? Wait, I’m mixing characters.

In any case, Hotch has lost the wife who loved him and his young son — she decided that playing second string to a life of chasing down depraved killers just wasn’t how she saw her future.

Oh, and Hotch is almost deaf because of car explosion last season. It smacked a little of the old CSI storyline with Grissom’s brush with deaf, but we’ll forgive CM for now.

Meanwhile, I’m going back to those past season episodes to play catch-up. Any suggestions?

0

Guest Review: Marc Webb’s 500 Days of Summer

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

by Alex Billington
firstshowing.

There’s a little indie film called 500 Days of Summer from music video director Marc Webb that has already nestled itself in the hearts of a handful of moviegoers. Our favorite indie studio, Fox Searchlight, is distributing it but it’s not out yet. However, the film has already test screened a few times in Southern California, earning so much appreciation that some fans have already seen it two or three times. One of those fans decided to drop by with a review, so as a way of introducing everyone to what is sure to become one of next year’s big indie hits, I decided to feature it today. Even if you have no clue what 500 Days of Summer is about, you’ll definitely want to read this – I’m certain you’ll be anxious to see it by the end.

Why 500 Days of Summer is the best movie I’ve screened this year isn’t the cast, made up primarily of Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Deschanel, or the tag line (”A Man Who Believes in Love Falls for a Woman Who Very-Much Doesn’t”) or even the online chatter falsely describing it as a “musical” (which I think we could always use more of anyway). No, why it’s the best has more to do with character than with setup; more feeling than exposition. The creators of the movie, first-timer’s all around, understand these people (beyond surfaced who-they-are, what-they-want, and how-they-get-it explanations, which dominate the rom-com genre) and, with an assured look at the dating styles of today, created a movie which comments and condemns the current idea of love, sex, and friendship. Oh, and it’s really funny.

500 Days of SummerLet me back up a bit: written with Starbucks-fueled, sappy pop-song admiration as well as with glances over Charlie Kaufman’s shoulder, the film jumps throughout the relationship between Thomas (Gordon-Levitt) and Summer (Deschanel), which lasts about as long as the title suggests. Certain key dates are setup at the start: when a major break up happens, when they meet, what’s at the end of day 498. Cue cards keep us aware of not just what’s happening in a certain scene, but also what it means in the context of their relationship. Told in a backwards-then-forwards way, we may get to see the 268th day before we see the 1st. We may see a big fight before we see them meet. In this way, it’s telling two stories for the admission price of one: Thomas attempting to live without Summer, and Thomas and Summer first meeting.

Sound like a lot is going on? Despite that, the complex structure underscores a simple plot; how the movie deals with the awkward crescendo up to dating as well as the awkward rebound dates following the fallout is where it’s strongest. In retelling the film to someone, they asked why we need yet another romantic comedy. My response was that this one is our romantic comedy, it’s about us and our generation. Summer willing to have every aspect of a relationship with Thomas except the “title” is believable to me. Thomas’ immediate attraction and second-thought dismissal of Summer is believable. Her bedside secrets and apartment she never fully moves into (get it?), his hyper-romantic view of love, her quickness for intimacy, his over analyzing every aspect – all of this is believable because it is of product of these times, where dating can be easily eschewed into so many categories (going out, dating, seeing each other, just friends and so on). Why the movie works as well as it does is that it doesn’t take sides in that struggle: neither Thomas or Summer is right, just as neither is wrong, because relationships aren’t that simple.

What is that simple, though, is people. Both lead performances are solid: Levitt’s puppy-dogged face and heart-on-his-sleeve demeanor, Deschanel’s ability to seem upfront and mysterious with the same look, all with a palpably understandable relationship at it’s center. Told from Thomas’ perspective, the film is based less in reality and more in his emotions – the day after a triumph, don’t you just feel like everyone is smiling at you? Or after a breakup, don’t you continually see their face everywhere you look? The supporting cast (Matthew Gray Gubler, Geoffrey Arend) all provide interesting, if less realized, aspects for Thomas to bounce off of, the notable exception being Rachel, his little sister, played by with grace and wisdom by Chloe Moretz – who’s dating advice and language continually runs against her young age, which would be gimmicky if she were in the film more. Luckily she steals only the few scenes she is in.

In lieu of good guys and bad guys, needless infidelities, frivolous external conflicts and scenes that talk too much (the movie has a few, to be fair), and instead of characters who learn tidy life lessons at its end, 500 Days of Summer works well as an ode to these easily confusing times.

0
Tags: , ,
Posted in Movies |